Chad E. Kirk

Chad E. Kirk

Chad E. Kirk
Badge #1240, Black Male, 45
Detective Specialist at Narcotics Borough Bronx South since May 2026
Also served at Narcotics Borough Bronx, Patrol Borough Bronx Neighborhood Safety Team, 48th Precinct, Patrol Borough Bronx Public Safety Teams
Service started January 2016, made $178,000 last year, Tax #960762

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26340
Closed: 10/10/2022

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$120,000   Stevens, Tyreek, et al. vs City of Ny, et al., 2024 BCSC BCSC 814248/2024E
$22,500   Woods, Clarence vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 BCSC BCSC 816273/2022E
$135,000   Slaughter, Issac vs City of New York, 2019 BCSC BCSC 033664/2019E
$40,000   Zied, Ritishea vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 033175/2019E
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
16 Allegations
6 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202500639, January 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Instructions)
additional details

Complaint #202407967, July 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202300125, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202207499, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, May 11, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days / Command Discipline B
additional details

Complaint #202003619, April 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201802517, March 2018
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #202500639, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Instructions)
additional details
Complaint #202407967, July 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Dominican Male, 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Question Dominican Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Dominican Male, 21-24 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202300125, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202207499, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, May 11, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days / Command Discipline B
additional details
Complaint #202003619, April 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201802517, March 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 48 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26340
Closed: 10/10/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 10 known lawsuits, $317,500 total settlements.

Hernandez, Joshua vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 802569/2026E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 10, 2026

Noble, Jamal vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 802074/2026E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 3, 2026

Greaves, Teren, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV08717, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 28, 2025

Shaw, Lakyza vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 816266/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 4, 2025

Taffe, Zac vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 804286/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 27, 2025

Stevens, Tyreek, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 814248/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 10, 2024, ended May 8, 2025
$120,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 4, 2023, Plaintiffs Tyreek Stevens, James Roberts and John Santamaria (collectively, "Plaintiff") was in the vicinity of East 162nd Street and Courtland Avenue, Defendants POLICE OFFICER BRYAN SCHEBLEIN, POLICE OFFICER SAMMY FIGUEROA, POLICE OFFICER BENITO CRUZ, POLICE OFFICER CHAD KIRK, and unnamed POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE/ROE, stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered and detained Plaintiff 1 in an aggressive and excessive manner. Plaintiff attests that they battered in an offensive and hostile manner causing battery in and about his head, neck, back, body and limbs. Plaintiff attests that Defendants illegally stopped and seized, searched and questioned based on race, and in order to meet arres...

Woods, Clarence vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 816273/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 15, 2022, ended December 20, 2024
$22,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 13, 2019, Clarence Woods (Plaintiff) was in the custody of the NYPD (Defendants) and was rear cuffed. Plaintiff was standing at the rear side of a passenger vehicle surrounded by several police officers. Defendants were assaulting plaintiff by pressing the latter’s body firmly upon a vehicle to making it difficult for Plaintiff to breathe, used a taser upon Plaintiff, as well as handcuffed Plaintiff in an excessively tight manner. Several Defendants, who did not participate in the incident, but were otherwise present and observed the violation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights failed to intercede on Plaintiff’s behalf.

New, Maurice vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 801741/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 3, 2022
Complaint
Description: On or about June 17, 2018, plaintiff was pulled over and stopped by the defendants, including defendant officers KIRK, SCHEKER and DOEs 1-10. Defendants proceeded to question plaintiff regarding illegal activity, physically restrained and removed plaintiff by rear handcuffing him in an excessively tight fashion, which resulted in substantial pain and physical discomfort in plaintiff’s wrists. Defendants KIRK, SCHEKER and DOEs 1-10 fabricated observations about plaintiff to justify his search and seizure, including the possession of a weapon, firearm and ammunition that they each falsely purported to have observed in plain view. Defendants, incl. officers KIRK, SCHEKER and DOEs 1-10 then forcibly removed plai...

Slaughter, Issac vs City of New York
Case # 033664/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 20, 2019, ended September 29, 2021
$135,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 8, 2018 at approximately 11:00 p.m. Plaintiff was lawfully in the area of Park Avenue and East 180th Street when POs Chad Kirk, John Doe, and John Roe approached and stopped Plaintiff as part of a racially-motivated "stop and frisk" program, then summarily searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained Plaintiff in an aggressive manner without legal justification. Plaintiff was taken to a precinct where he was subjected to an unlawful strip search. Plaintiff remained incarcerated for over 24 hours. Plaintiff was arraigned after his arrest and maliciously prosecuted, requiring him to make numerous court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges against him were terminated fav...

Zied, Ritishea vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 033175/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 7, 2019, ended March 14, 2022
$40,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 13, 2019 at 1:30 AM, Plaintiff Ritishea Zied was near Marion Avenue and East 187th Street, Bronx, when Defendants Officer Robert Wichers, Officer John Doe, Officer John Roe, Sergeant Bryan Ortiz, Officer Jonathan Gonzalez, Officer Yvonne Rosario, Officer Yaowen Liu, Officer Michael O'Connor, Officer Edin Bacovic, Officer Chad Kirk and Officer Tatiana Latorre summarily stopped, searched, grabbed, handcuffed, assaulted, battered, and detained him using excessive force. Plaintiff was taken to an unidentified precinct and to the Bronx Criminal Courthouse. While in Defendant Officer's custody, Plaintiff was subjected to a strip search and assault of her head, neck, back, body, and limbs. Plaintiff was incar...