Complaint #202003619, April 2020

Incident: April 24, 2020
Received: May 28, 2020
Closed: April 21, 2022


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 48th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Vincent Arias, Jonathan Gonzalez, Avdo Javorovac, Nicolas Lupo, Brian Travis
Officer: Arini, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Amico, Steven
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Speca, Steven
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ortiz, Bryan
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Kirk, Chad
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Speca, Steven
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Arini, Michael Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Amico, Steven Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Speca, Steven Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Ortiz, Bryan Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Kirk, Chad Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Speca, Steven Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)

Penalties

Ortiz, Bryan
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Kirk, Chad
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Speca, Steven
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.