Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Alexander O. Timoll
Badge #7233,
Black Male
Police Officer at Transit Bureau District 33 since March 2022
Also served at
Transit Bureau District 34
Service
started January 2020,
made $105,000 last year,
Tax #969392
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202501260,
February 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202309852,
October 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202208585,
December 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) |
| Complainant: | Male, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202501260, February 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202309852, October 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) | Male, 45-49 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202208585, December 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | White, 21-24 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) | Male, 60-64 | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.