Michael A. Nolasco

Badge #5202, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at 68th Precinct since December 2023
Service started July 2015, made $146,000 last year, Tax #958992

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Exonerated
3 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202511684, November 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202208866, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, July 24, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202007757, November 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201910080, November 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202511684, November 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202208866, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Stop Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Middle Eastern/North African Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, July 24, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details
Complaint #202007757, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 65-69 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201910080, November 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 42 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.