Robert H. Smilove

Badge #3950, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since November 2019, active
Also served at Brooklyn Court Section
Service started January 2016, made $136,000 last year, Tax #961303

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2016-16651
Closed: 12/19/2016

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complaint Withdrawn
3 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202106261, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: White Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202104294, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201704062, May 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202106261, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number White Male, 60-64 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202104294, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Female, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201704062, May 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2016-16651
Closed: 12/19/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty failed to handle properly his off-duty firearm, discharging one (1) round from said firearm, causing property damage.
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully possessed an unauthorized off-duty firearm.
  3. Guilty: While off-duty wrongfully failed to remain at the scene of said incident, request the response of the Patrol Supervisor, precinct of occurrence, or to notify the Internal Affairs Bureau, as required.
  4. Guilty: While off-duty having discharged one (1) round from an unauthorized off-duty firearm, removed the spent shell casing from the scene of the discharge, went to his residence, unloaded the firearm which had been discharged, and secured the firearm, cartridges and casing inside said residence.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), pre-trial suspension days (30 days), vacation days (15 days)