James G. Weck

James G. Weck

James G. Weck
Badge #10752, White Male
Police Officer at Police Service Area 7 since May 2018, active
Service started April 2017, made $110,000 last year, Tax #963803

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (5)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording (2)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) (2)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25292
Closed: 12/5/2022
Case: 2022-27163
Closed: 11/13/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$90,000   Anderson, Javid vs City of New York, et al., 2022 BCSC BCSC 810625/2022E
$75,000   Parris, James vs City of New York, et al., 2020 SDNY SDNY 20CV10847
$70,000   Smith, Michael vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 034868/2019E
View Details

Complaints

9 Complaints
32 Allegations
13 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
11 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Complaint Withdrawn
4 Exonerated
2 Unable to Determine
8 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202208437, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202201577, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202100511, January 2021
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202008107, December 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202008000, December 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202106373, November 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: SOL Expired prior to APU
APU Case Status: Closed: SOL Expired prior to APU, February 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #202003429, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, September 2022
additional details

Complaint #201902150, February 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201806185, July 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202208437, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202201577, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 30-34 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202100511, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Female, 25-29 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202008107, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202008000, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202106373, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: SOL Expired prior to APU
APU Case Status: Closed: SOL Expired prior to APU, February 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #202003429, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, September 2022
additional details
Complaint #201902150, February 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 37 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201806185, July 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 22 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25292
Closed: 12/5/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
  2. Wrongfully searched an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully stopped a vehicle.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-27163
Closed: 11/13/2022
Case Details:
  1. Interfere with a recording device.
  2. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $235,000 total settlements.

Huggin, Johnny vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 810499/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 11, 2023

Knight, Tahje vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 810019/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 29, 2023

Anderson, Javid vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 810625/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 21, 2022, ended December 5, 2022
$90,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 22, 2022, in the Bronx, P.O. Weck, and unknown P.O.s Doe and Roe approached, stopped, searched, assaulted, and detained Plaintiff Javid Anderson with no legal justification. Mr. Anderson was arraigned and falsely prosecuted. He remained incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to make numerous court appearances until all charges against him were favorably terminated.

Parris, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 20CV10847, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 29, 2020, ended July 8, 2021
$75,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 14, 2019, Plaintiff was stopped by two plainclothes police officers while two other officers observed. These officers were some subset of: NYPD Officer Carlos Gomez, Officer Kelvis Rodriguez (resigned), Officer James Weck, Officer Jose Tejada, Lieutenant Eric Dym, and Police Sergeant Natalie Bautista. The officers unlawfully searched him. Plaintiff became nervous and spit on the ground, and he was then tightly handcuffed and arrested by the officers. Officers also unlawfully accessed Plaintiff's sealed arrest history. At the precinct, an officer took Plaintiff's candy. Plaintiff was also strip-searched in a cell. Plaintiff was ultimately charged with littering and with spitting on the sidewalk; the...

Smith, Michael vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 034868/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 20, 2019, ended February 22, 2022
$70,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 22, 2019, around 7:30 PM, Plaintiff Michael Smith was stopped and frisked near East 137th Street and St. Ann's Avenue, Bronx, when Defendant NYPD Officers James Weck, John Doe, and John Roe touched, grabbed, handcuffed, seized, and arrested him with excessive force. This excessive forse resulted in injuries to Plaintiff's head, neck, back, body, and limbs. Plaintiff was processed at an unidentified precinct station and then taken to the Bronx Criminal Courthouse. While in Defendant Officer's custody, Plaintiff was subjected to a strip search and assault of his head, neck, back, body, and limbs. Plaintiff was incarcerated for over 24 hours prior to release, and was then required to make numerous ...

Other Documents