Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $17,500 total settlements.
Mrabet, Mounir vs Detective Gurleski, Mark
Case # 25CV01952,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 19, 2025, ended April 3, 2026
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Alkaifi, Osman, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 805935/2021E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 29, 2021
Complaint
Description: On July 13, 2018, P.O. GURILESKI, INGRASSIA, and JOHN or JANE approached the Plaintiffs inside the Deli Grocery Store in the Bronx. P.O. GURILESKI, INGRASSIA, and JOHN or JANE unlawfully questioned the Plaintiffs and accused them of possessing a synthetic form of marijuana despite possessing no valid reason to inquire. P.O. GURILESKI, INGRASSIA, and JOHN or JANE never observed Plaintiffs in criminal possession of synthetic cannabinoids nor any other illegal drug, controlled substance, or any other contraband. P.O. GURILESKI, INGRASSIA, and JOHN or JANE violently grabbed and contorted the Plaintiffs’ arms behind their backs and applied metal handcuffs to their writs in an excessively tight fashion. Then P.O. GUR...
Wright, Curtis vs Parente, John, et al.
Case # 20CV00622,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 9, 2020, ended February 17, 2023
Zero Disposition
Tyler, Aaron vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV02750,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 16, 2016, ended March 3, 2017
$17,500 Settlement
Amended Complaint,
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was walking to the corner store when Plainclothes officers chased him without identifying themselves. Plaintiff ran until he was struck by a vehicle and fell. Officers then handcuffed him, assaulted him, searched him, and arrested him. Plaintiff was taken to the 79th Precinct, strip-searched, and charged with PL 220.16(1) 'Criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree' and PL 205.30 'Resisting arrest', which the DA declined to prosecute.