Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Jeff D. Mayard
Badge #22950,
Black Male
Police Officer at Extended Leave Services Group since April 2026
Also served at
INS TRN,
Manhattan Court Section,
Field Training Unit,
Military and Extended Leave Desk,
13th Precinct,
84th Precinct
Service
started July 2012,
made $123,000 last year,
Tax #953073
Discipline Cases:
Case: 2023-27920
Closed: 12/6/2023
Case: 2017-18258
Closed: 6/27/2018
View Details
Lawsuit Settlements:
$50,000 Baez, Misael vs City of New York, et al., 2016 NYCSC NYCSC 157295/2016
View Details
$50,000 Baez, Misael vs City of New York, et al., 2016 NYCSC NYCSC 157295/2016
View Details
Complaints
3
Complaints
6
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
2
Unfounded
Complaint #202309167,
September 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202308156,
January 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition) |
| Complainant: | Female, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #201500656,
January 2015
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 60 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | White Male, 60 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | White Male, 60 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202309167, September 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | White Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202308156, January 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) | Female, 21-24 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition) | Female, 21-24 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201500656, January 2015 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | White Male, 60 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | White Male, 60 | Exonerated |
| Force: Physical force | White Male, 60 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2023-27920
Closed: 12/6/2023
Case Details:
- Pleaded Guilty: Made improper communications via whatsapp.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)
Case: 2017-18258
Closed: 6/27/2018
Case Details:
- Guilty: Disobeyed the direction of a Supervisor.
- Guilty: Failed to monitor his portable radio and failed to respond to radio calls.
- Guilty: Failed to report for duty in a timely manner for an overtime assignment.
- Guilty: Failed to respond to radio calls directed to him.
- Guilty: Impeded an official Department investigation by making one or more inaccurate or misleading statements.
- Guilty: Made false and/or inaccurate statemtns to a Supervisor.
- Guilty: Made one or more false and/or inaccurate entries in his activity log.
- Guilty: Made one or more false and/or inaccurate statements to a Supervisor.
- Guilty: Made one or more false, inaccurate and/or misleading statements at an official Department interview.
- Guilty: Make one or more false and/or inaccurate statemtns to a Supervisor.
- Guilty: While on an overtime assignment was off-post without permission or authority.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (30 days)
Lawsuits
Baez, Misael vs City of New York, et al.Case # 157295/2016, Supreme Court - New York, September 9, 2016, ended January 3, 2018
$50,000 Settlement