Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Griffith, Dijon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 817867/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, November 16, 2023
Loran, Ryan, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 801396/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 31, 2023
Espinal, Jessenia, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 815459/2022,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 19, 2022
Complaint
Description: On November 19 2021, at approximately, 7:00 a.m., in the vicinity of 2028 Davidson Avenue, County of Bronx, NY, Defendant Police Officer Daniel Demarco, Defendant Detective Dilma Aguirre, Defendant Detective Nicholas Columbouris, Defendant Police Officer John Doe and Defendant Police Officer John Roe, absent an arrest warrant, probable cause, reasonable cause or any legal justification and based on fraud, perjury and misrepresentations, approached Plaintiff Jessenia Espinal for no reason summarily stopped, frisked, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, handcuffed and detained her in an aggressive and excessive manner. Plaintiff was fingerprinted and photographs without her consent, strip searched and held o...