Hoelmy Ramos

Badge #4720, Hispanic Male
Former Detective Grade 3 at 52nd Precinct Detective Squad
Also served at 48th Precinct
Service started January 2004, ended April 2021, Tax #934093

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2018-18649
Closed: 4/2/2019

View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
12 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
4 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201115778, September 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201107140, June 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201106404, May 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201008785, June 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200902875, February 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200803804, March 2008
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Black Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200607395, June 2006
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201115778, September 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 15 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201107140, June 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 50 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201106404, May 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 51 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201008785, June 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 47 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 47 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 47 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200902875, February 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Hispanic Male, 50 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 50 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200803804, March 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray Black Male, 39 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200607395, June 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 22 Unfounded
Force: Physical force White Male, 22 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2018-18649
Closed: 4/2/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully utilized a Department computer to conduct database inquiries unrelated to Department business and wrongfully divulged information from an improper computer inquiry.
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully did fail and neglect to advise the Department of a change of his residential address.
  3. Guilty: Failed to notify the Department about having received a subpoena unrelated to Department business.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Cedres, Aaron vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 021525/2016E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 11, 2016

Cruz, Jose vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 024850/2014E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 27, 2014, ended March 28, 2017
Zero Disposition