Complaint from June 1, 2011

Case number 201107140
Incident: June 1, 2011
Received: June 3, 2011
Closed: May 9, 2012

Witness Officers: Jose Rosa, Frederick Winter
Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 48th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Officer:	Ramos, Hoelmy Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 50
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Sisco, Jeffrey White Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 50
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Sisco, Jeffrey White Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 50
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Santiago, Richard Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 50
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Marrero, Ronaldo Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 50
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Marrero, Ronaldo Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 50
Allegation:	Force: Radio as club
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Ramos, Hoelmy Hispanic Male	Black Male, 50	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated
Sisco, Jeffrey White Male	Black Male, 50	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Sisco, Jeffrey White Male	Black Male, 50	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment	Unsubstantiated
Santiago, Richard Hispanic Male	Black Male, 50	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched	Exonerated
Marrero, Ronaldo Hispanic Male	Black Male, 50	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Marrero, Ronaldo Hispanic Male	Black Male, 50	Force: Radio as club	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.