Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Azor-El, Jean vs Harrison, Anthony Salov, et al.
Case # 20CV10857,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 8, 2021
Griffin-Robinson, Sonja R. vs Warhit, Barry E., et al.
Case # 20CV02712,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 14, 2020, ended March 18, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On April 18, 2018, NYPD and Harrison P.D., with a “false warrant” searched personal property of Plaintiff that was not included on the warrant. Plaintiff was arrested in her home and taken to the precinct in Westchester before posting bail. When Plaintiff returned home, several of her personal items were missing, amounting to over $75,000 in stolen property.