Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.
Bennett, Tariq vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 807241/2024E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, May 7, 2024, ended March 17, 2025
$30,000 Settlement
Siguencia, Martha vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 303027/2009,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 17, 2009, ended April 3, 2013
Administrative Closing