Victor Roopnarine

Badge #15175, Asian Male
Police Officer at 79th Precinct since June 2016
Service started July 2014, made $156,000 last year, Tax #957104

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Other

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 6/19/2024
Case: 2 Allegations

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$30,000   Battle, Anthony vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 507890/2020
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Unavailable
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202310641, November 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202301667, February 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202208508, December 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, June 5, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202204384, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201700289, December 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202310641, November 2023
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202301667, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202208508, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, June 5, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details
Complaint #202204384, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201700289, December 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 6/19/2024
Case Details:
  1. 01.
  2. Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action


Lawsuits

Battle, Anthony vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 507890/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, May 27, 2020, ended March 8, 2022
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 16, 2019, at approximately 12:30 AM, plaintiff was lawfully present at 92 Spencer Place, in the borough of Brooklyn, when police officer Victor Roopnarine, sergeant Jason Reisgerzog, and unidentified police officers (John Does 1-10) unlawfully stopped, questioned, frisked, and falsely arrested him. Plaintiff was lawfully attending a barbeque at his cousin, Ramel Battles' house at the aforementioned address. The police officers entered the location. The officers told plaintiff to "go home or go inside." Plaintiff complied, but was still tasered (he had to have the prongs from the taser surgically removed from his back). He was then physically grabbed and tackled, and fell to the ground. While on the gr...

Other Documents