Michael T. Haigh

Michael T. Haigh

Michael T. Haigh
Badge #19316, White Male, 53
Police Officer at 19th Precinct since January 2006, active
Service started January 2005, made $142,000 last year, Tax #936724

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2014-11510
Closed: 8/16/2016

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$5,000   Tinsley, Terry vs J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.a., et al., 2013 NYCSC NYCSC 153310/2013
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201901376, January 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper dissemination of medical info
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper dissemination of medical info
Complainant: White Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201300781, January 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201212334, September 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
additional details

Complaint #201112919, October 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201901376, January 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper dissemination of medical info White Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Improper dissemination of medical info White Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force White Male, 35 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) White Male, 35 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 35 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201300781, January 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 34 Exonerated
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 34 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201212334, September 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Hit against inanimate object White Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
additional details
Complaint #201112919, October 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-11510
Closed: 8/16/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, wrongfully used force against an individual known to the Department,
  2. Guilty: Was discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (5 days)


Lawsuits

Tinsley, Terry vs J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.a., et al.
Case # 153310/2013, Supreme Court - New York, April 15, 2013, ended February 11, 2016
$5,000 Settlement