Michael T. Haigh

Michael T. Haigh

Michael T. Haigh
Badge #19316, White Male, 56
Police Officer at 19th Precinct since January 2006
Service started January 2005, made $186,000 last year, Tax #936724

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2014-11510
Closed: 8/16/2016

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$5,000   Tinsley, Terry vs J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.a., et al., 2013 NYCSC NYCSC 153310/2013
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201901376, January 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper dissemination of medical info
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper dissemination of medical info
Complainant: White Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201300781, January 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201212334, September 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 11, 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
additional details

Complaint #201112919, October 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201901376, January 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper dissemination of medical info White Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Improper dissemination of medical info White Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force White Male, 35 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) White Male, 35 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 35 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201300781, January 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 34 Exonerated
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 34 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201212334, September 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Hit against inanimate object White Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 11, 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
additional details
Complaint #201112919, October 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-11510
Closed: 8/16/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Was discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, wrongfully used force against an individual known to the Department,
Penalty: Vacation days (5 days)


Lawsuits

Tinsley, Terry vs J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.a., et al.
Case # 153310/2013, Supreme Court - New York, April 15, 2013, ended February 11, 2016
$5,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 19, 2012, Plaintiff was physically in a bank where he complained that a teller failed to deposit $200 of $400 deposit he made. Plaintiff was told not to return to the bank without the police. Plaintiff then stepped out of the bank, dialled the NYPD, and told them that the bank had robbed him of $200. When the Defendant NYPD officers Alton and Heize arrived, they physically assaulted him, threw him face first onto a gurney, forced him into an ambulance, and stuck him in the locked psych ward of a hospital where he was held for two days. The EMS workers who attended to Plaintiff did not behave better than the police. No criminal charges of any kind ere ever filed against Plaintiff.