Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Michael J. Holman
Badge #4728,
Black Male
Police Officer at 1st Precinct since March 2019
Service
started January 2012,
made $169,000 last year,
Tax #951824
Complaints
3
Complaints
8
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202409270,
September 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain |
| Complainant: | White Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202305706,
June 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | White Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | White Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | White Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #202105481,
September 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202409270, September 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | White Female, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain | White Female, 50-54 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202305706, June 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 25-29 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Female, 25-29 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | White Female, 25-29 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | White Female, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202105481, September 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Male, 55-59 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Jones Sr., Rafael Arden vs P.O. Holman, John Doe Et. AlCase # 16CV00556, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 11, 2016
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was at the under-served veterans office when Defendant officers arrived and asked him to get against the wall. Plaintiff began recording and was told he wasn't under arrest. EMS workers then arrived and Plaintiff was handcuffed and brought to the hospital. Plaintiff was asked to sign a consent to treatment form and when he refused he was strapped to a stretcher, injected with a syringe and work up 2 days later. Plaintiff got in touch with his attorney and a judge ruled that he should be released from custody.