Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word
Discourtesy: Word
Muhitul Ambia
Badge #786,
Asian Male
Police Officer at OPS Unit since May 2026
Also served at
32nd Precinct
Service
started July 2008,
made $181,000 last year,
Tax #946744
Complaints
3
Complaints
7
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3
Unfounded
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202401599,
February 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202309123,
September 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
| Complainant: | Male, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | Command Discipline - A |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days) |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201806968,
July 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Electronic device information deletion |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 10 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | Age 10 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202401599, February 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202309123, September 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 15-17 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Male, 15-17 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Discourtesy: Word | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A | ||
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days) | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201806968, July 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Electronic device information deletion | Black Male, 49 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Black Female, 10 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Age 10 | Unfounded |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Rodolph, Renay vs Garcia, Luis R. Reyes
Case # 162102/2014, Supreme Court - New York, July 8, 2015, ended January 28, 2020
Administrative Closing
Rodolph, Renay vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 155740/2014, Supreme Court - New York, October 9, 2014, ended September 25, 2020
Zero Disposition