Kevin Choi

Badge #5447, Asian Male
Detective Specialist at 94th Precinct since July 2020, active
Also served at 107th Precinct
Service started July 2006, made $139,000 last year, Tax #941554


Complaints

8 Complaints
19 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Complainant Unavailable
5 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
5 Unfounded
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202207916, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202202956, May 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201703996, May 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Female, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201701731, November 2016
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Female, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Female, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201609862, November 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Asian Female, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Asian Female, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Asian Female, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201506405, July 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201412600, December 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200907331, May 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Female, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202207916, November 2022
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202202956, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Age 25-29 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201703996, May 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Female, 24 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Female, 24 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 24 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201701731, November 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female, 38 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Female, 38 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Female, 38 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Black Male, 35 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Other Female, 38 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201609862, November 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Asian Female, 31 Complainant Uncooperative
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Asian Female, 31 Complainant Uncooperative
Offensive Language: Gender Asian Female, 31 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201506405, July 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
Discourtesy: Action Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201412600, December 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200907331, May 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 29 Complainant Unavailable
Offensive Language: Race Black Female, 29 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2011-4880
Opened: 12/7/2011
Closed: 7/23/2012
Case Details:
  1. Dismissal On Dao Motion: Failed to properly voucher property of a prisoner that he arrested
  2. Guilty: Inaccurately indicated on a prisoner's arrest report that said prisoner refused to make a telephone call
  3. Guilty: While on and off duty initiated electronic messages to a friend of a prisoner the he arrested
  4. Guilty: Wrongfully initiated electronic messages to a friend of a prisoner said officer arrested
Penalty: Forfeiture of fifteen vacation days


Lawsuits

Rhodes, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV07884, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 19, 2022
Complaint
Description: On October 30, 2021 plaintiff James Rhodes was playing his Saxophone in a reasonable manner on a side walk when Police Officer Alpsoy approached plaintiff and instructed plaintiff stop playing and leave the area. Rhodes asserted his constitutional right to play his saxophone in a reasonable manner and refused to stop or leave. Eventually SGT. Burgos arrived and instructed plaintiff to leave and Rhodes reasserted his constitutional right. After, P.O. John Doe attacked Rhodes with a taser, even though Rhodes posed no threat to anyone, and SGT. Burgos, P.O. Alpsoy, and P.O. Jane Doe did not stop their colleague from the unlawful use of force. P.O. Alpsoy falsely accused Rhodes of assaulting SGT. Burgos, obstructun...

Other Documents