Rmit Sharma

Badge #5367, Asian Male
Former Police Officer at Queens Court Section
Also served at Police Service Area 9 VIPER, 79th Precinct
Service started December 2020, ended February 2025, Tax #970854

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Complaints

1 Complaint
3 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202301667, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202301667, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.