James J. Nesdill

James J. Nesdill

James J. Nesdill
Badge #6853, White Male
Police Officer at 10th Precinct since May 2023, active
Also served at Manhattan Court Section
Service started July 2007, made $138,000 last year, Tax #945264

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27408
Closed: 3/13/2023
Case: 2022-26583
Closed: 10/12/2022

View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202202157, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202202157, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Male, 45-49 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Action Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27408
Closed: 3/13/2023
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: Counseling, pre-trial suspension days (30 days), vacation days (15 days)

Case: 2022-26583
Closed: 10/12/2022
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongful entry of a premises.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to identify themselves as a Police Officer.
Penalty: Counseling, pre-trial suspension days (30 days), vacation days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Morant, William vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159701/2016, Supreme Court - New York, January 3, 2017, ended December 14, 2018
Zero Disposition

Morant, William vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 153286/2016, Supreme Court - New York, April 20, 2016