Michael Williams

Badge #2498, Black Male
Former Sergeant at 46th Precinct
Service started September 2000, ended October 2018, Tax #927674

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest

Lawsuit settlements:
$75,000   Lewis, Tamika vs City of New York, et al., 2019 SDNY SDNY 19CV08713
$2,300   Hampton, Timothy vs City of New York, et al., 2018 SDNY SDNY 18CV07755
$500,000   Olguin, Asuncion Bautista vs City of New York, et al., 2018 BCSC BCSC 025519/2018E
$23,500   Clavijo, James vs City of New York, et al., 2013 SDNY SDNY 13CV06148
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201306200, June 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Instructions
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Formalized Training, April 2016
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200700146, January 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200509273, August 2005
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201306200, June 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 55 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 53 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 55 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Instructions
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Formalized Training, April 2016
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200700146, January 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 45 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200509273, August 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Male Unsubstantiated
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male Exonerated
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Hispanic Male, 31 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 31 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $600,800 total settlements.

Lewis, Tamika vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV08713, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 21, 2019, ended August 6, 2021
$75,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was leaving her girlfriend's home in the Bronx after a verbal argument while carrying a large backpack and a large duffle bag. Officers Gallagher, Edwards, Ramroop, Panartto, Osmanovic, and Williams of the 46th Precinct entered the residence and arrested the plaintiff for grand larceny for holding a debit card that they knew she legally possessed. The officers threw the plaintiff against the wall, forcefully yanked her arms behind her back and uncomfortably around her large backpack, punched her in the face several times, stomped on her foot, and kneed the back of her legs. Based on the officers' false allegations, plaintiff was charged with felony assault in the second degree, assault in the third d...

Hampton, Timothy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV07755, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 4, 2018, ended May 7, 2019
$2,300 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 7, 2018, and on September 7 of the same year, plaintiff was falsely arrested under very similar circumstances. Plaintiff would be walking or waiting on the street and then be arrested for allegedly accosting people and engaging in gambling. He would be subjected to an unlawful search and taken to the precinct whilst being handcuffed too tightly. In both instances, prosecutors declined to prosecute.

Olguin, Asuncion Bautista vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 025519/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, May 18, 2018, ended May 22, 2019
$500,000 Settlement

Clavijo, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV06148, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 4, 2013, ended February 10, 2014
$23,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about April 28, 2012, the Plaintiff was assaulted and rendered unconscious by three unknown individuals as he exited a restaurant in NY. Despite being a victim and having his personal belongings, including his mobile phone and a high-value leather jacket, taken during the assault, the defendant NYPD officers falsely accused the Plaintiff of damaging the restaurant's property. They subjected him to handcuffing and seized his credit card, allowing the restaurant to charge $250 without his consent. Despite the Plaintiff's repeated requests for assistance in reclaiming his belongings, none of the defendant officers provided any help. After being transported to the precinct, he was wrongfully charged with Diso...