Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Hanjie Lu
Also served at
60th Precinct
Service
started July 2006,
made $227,000 last year,
Tax #942084
Asian Male
Complaints
4
Complaints
9
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Complainant Unavailable
1
Exonerated
3
Unfounded
3
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202207163,
October 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202105300,
August 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
Complaint #202006731,
September 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #201000870,
March 2009
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 47 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202207163, October 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Black Male, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202105300, August 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202006731, September 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Male, 30-34 | Exonerated |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Male, 21-24 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Hispanic Male, 21-24 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201000870, March 2009 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 20 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched | Unfounded | |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 47 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-25642
Closed: 6/8/2022
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-25643
Closed: 6/8/2022
Case Details:
- Failed to activate their body worn camera.
- Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
- Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other
Lawsuits
Sherrard, Kalan vs City of New York, et al.Case # 14CV09321, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 4, 2014, ended December 22, 2016
Settlement
Complaint, Amended Complaint, Second Amended Complaint
Description: On April 6, 2014, plaintiff, an artist, was giving a performance at the 42nd Street Subway Mezzanine under Times Square when he was approached by defendant Lu, who told plaintiff to cease his performance and to leave the area. Plaintiff responded by asking Lu why he was being told to leave, and cited MTA rules expressly allowing artistic performances on MTA property. After an exchange between the two lasting not more than 45 seconds, Lu informed plaintiff that he was being placed under arrest. Lu directed defendant Tavares, another officer on the scene, to arrest plaintiff in the middle of the Mezzanine platform, as dozens of onlookers and passersby watched. After plaintiff was placed in handcuffs, Tavares sear...