Mark D. Ruppert

Mark D. Ruppert

Mark D. Ruppert
Badge #2675, White Male
Sergeant at Criminal Intelligence Section since March 2023
Also served at 30th Precinct, 33rd Precinct, Field Training Unit
Service started January 2013, made $158,000 last year, Tax #954305

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun Pointed
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment

Complaints

5 Complaints
11 Allegations
4 Substantiated
4 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202400610, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202205410, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Hispanic, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003339, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201708620, October 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Case Status: Closed: Trial verdict reversed by PC, Final verdict Not Guilty, October 14, 2021
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201702828, April 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Asian Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202400610, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Hispanic Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202205410, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Hispanic, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202003339, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 35-39 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201708620, October 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Hispanic Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Force: Gun Pointed Hispanic Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Abuse of Authority: Other Hispanic Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Case Status: Closed: Trial verdict reversed by PC, Final verdict Not Guilty, October 14, 2021
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201702828, April 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Asian Male, 26 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 6 known lawsuits.

Aragon, Andy vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 155639/2025, Supreme Court - New York, May 2, 2025

Delacruz, Alexis vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 161143/2021, Supreme Court - New York, December 15, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about April 24, 2019, NYPD officers Stephen Guiney, Mark Ruppert and others unlawfully stopped Plaintiff's vehicle and searched Plaintiff and the vehicle. The officers placed Plaintiff into handcuffs and under arrest, using excessive force. They touched and grabbed Plaintiff's private parts, shoving their hands in Plaintiff's pants and cutting Plaintiff's underwear, exposing him in public view. Plaintiff was transported to the police precinct, then Manhattan Central Booking, where he was subsequently arraigned. The officers recovered no contraband from the vehicle, and they falsely informed the DA's office that they had observed Plaintiff commit crimes. On or about June 2021, Plaintiff's criminal case was...

Dula, Bryant vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 804667/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 8, 2021

Dula, Bryant vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 453300/2021, Supreme Court - New York, April 8, 2021, ended October 3, 2023
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On July 8, 2017, while lawfully a passenger in a vehicle near 227 West 140th Street in New York, NY, the plaintiff was unlawfully stopped, approached, searched, assaulted, battered, arrested, and detained by the defendants, including Mark Ruppert, Anderson Ortiz, Fredy Cruz, Danny Guzman, and John Does 1-10, in an excessive manner without legal justification, and solely due to his race and national origin. The defendants forcibly removed the plaintiff from the vehicle without any legal basis and conducted an illegal search. They alleged an illegal firearm was found on another occupant but falsely attributed its possession to the plaintiff. Despite knowing he was not in possession of any firearm, the defendants ...

Billings, Lamont, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 152398/2021, Supreme Court - New York, March 10, 2021
Complaint
Description: On July 8, 2017, the plaintiff was without just cause, probable cause, or provocation, and with reckless, negligent, and callous disregard for the truth, and without investigation, touched, grabbed, handcuffed, seized, and arrested in an excessive manner and with excessive force by defendant NYPD officers including, Mark Ruppert, John Doe, and John Roe. The plaintiff was maliciously, intentionally, and falsely accused of having committed a crime. The defendant officers also applied harmful and offensive contact to the plaintiff during the arrest.

Garcia, Juan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 160166/2017, Supreme Court - New York, March 9, 2018, ended March 29, 2021
Administrative Closing
Complaint
Description: On August 24, 2016, Police Officer Mark Ruppert, Sergeant Anderson Ortiz and other police officers stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, arrested and detained the plaintiff in an aggressive and excessive manner without a warrant, probable cause, reasonable cause or any legal justification. Defendants' conducts were solely on the basis of his age and/or race. Because of the defendants conduct, the plaintiff suffered great and permanent bodily injury in and about his head, neck, back, body and limbs and was rendered sick, sore, lame and disabled, and suffered conscious pain. The plaintiff was falsely and maliciously prosecuted with committing a crime, but the criminal action against him was terminated ...

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 10/14/2021