Natasha A. Purrier

Badge #5286, Black Female, 43
Sergeant at Police Service Area 3 since February 2024, active
Also served at Intelligence Division, 84th Precinct
Service started July 2010, made $114,000 last year, Tax #949515

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons

Complaints

1 Complaint
3 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201505886, July 2015
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201505886, July 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 32 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 32 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Male, 32 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Saint-Fort, Lendel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV06879, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 17, 2022
Complaint
Description: On June 4, 2022, Plaintiff was on a street in Brooklyn when NYPD officers Michael Lugo, Jonathan Suero, Police Sergeant Purrier, and seven other police officers attempted to issue a summons related to Plaintiff's vehicle which they alleged was double-parked, while the Plaintiff asserts he committed no crimes or offenses. The Defendant Police Officers falsely arrested the Plaintiff. While arresting the Plaintiff, the Defendant Police Officers used excessive, unnecessary, beyond the scope physical force including the use of a CEW. Plaintiff was required to appear in criminal court, where all charges against him were dismissed in their entirety with him accepting an Adjournment in Contemplation of Discharge.

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter