James Curran

Badge #1324, White Male
Former Sergeant at Patrol Borough Queens South
Service started July 1989, ended June 2009, Tax #895335

Lawsuit settlements:
$7,950   Connor v. City of New York et al, EDNY EDNY 15CV07079
View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
1 Allegation
0 Substantiated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #9202424, August 1992
Allegation: Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9202424, August 1992
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Beat Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $7,950 total settlements.

Connor v. City of New York et al
Case # 15CV07079, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$7,950 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Suit regarding the wrongful conviction of Plaintiff due to false statements by unreliable informants, suppression of evidence, and inadequate police investigation. Plaintiff was convicted of kidnapping in the first and second degree. Appellate Court confirmed his conviction in 1995 and Plaintiff filed a Motion to Vacate Conviction in 2010. The court initially denied the motion to vacate, but the decision was reversed by the appellate court. The appellate court found that the prosecution had violated Brady and vacated Plaintiff's conviction.

Wagstaffe v. City of New York et al
Case # 15CV07089, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Complaint
Description: Suit regarding the wrongful conviction of Plaintiff due to false statements by unreliable informants, suppression of evidence, and inadequate police investigation. Plaintiff was convicted of kidnapping in the first and second degree. Appellate Court confirmed his conviction in 1995 and Plaintiff filed a Motion to Vacate Conviction in 2010. The court initially denied the motion to vacate, but the decision was reversed by the appellate court. The appellate court found that the prosecution had violated Brady and vacated Plaintiff's conviction.