Conclusion Meanings:
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.
Berookhim, Nathan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV07006,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 22, 2017, ended June 22, 2018
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officer Kazlas pointed a taser at Plaintiff and then proceeded to grab him, twist his arms behind his back, overly tightly handcuff him, escort him to the NYPD's 6th precinct, and imprison the Plaintiff in a holding cell. The Defendants then conspired to charge the Plaintiff for 140.10(a) ñ Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree and New York Penal Law ß 140.05 ñ Trespass. The criminal charges were ACD and all charges were subsequently dismissed and sealed.
Olmo, Michelle, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV07518,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 30, 2014, ended April 21, 2015
Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 14, 2013, Plaintiffs Padin and Olmo were walking on the sidewalk. Defendant officers seized Plaintiff Padin, placed him in a chokehold, threw him to the ground and cuffed his arms tightly behind his back. Defendant officers roughly pushed Plaintiff Olmo against a wall and cuffed her arms tightly behind her back. Plaintiff Olmo suffered an asthma attack but was not treated. Plaintiff Padin suffered a seizure and was transported to the hospital for treatment, followed by transport to the 76th Precinct. Plaintiff Olmo was transported directly to the 76th Precinct. Plaintiff Olmo was charged with resisting arrest, obstructing government action and disorderly conduct, and spent 24 hours before she was ...