Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 5 known lawsuits, $250,000 total settlements.
Mentore, Joel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 822833/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 29, 2025
Priester-King, Daquan vs Nypd Police Officer Bhatti, Aaqib et al.
Case # 24CV03050,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 28, 2024, ended April 14, 2025
$215,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 4, 2022, Plaintiff was walking along the sidewalk when Defendant Bhatti and Defendant Caraballo arrested the plaintiff, tightly cuffing and dragging him across the ground, causing severe pain and physical injuries in the process. At no time did the plaintiff commit a crime, violate the law in any way, nor did the officers have objective reason to accuse Plaintiff of doing so. The officers did not recover any drugs, weapons, graffiti instruments, or other illegal contraband from Plaintiff or from his location.
After plaintiff was placed into custody at Kings Country Central Bookings, Defendant Bhatti, Defendant Caraballo, and Defendant Police Officers John Doe 1-10 provided the District Attorney’s...
Williams, Jermaine vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 23CV01381,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 16, 2023, ended February 26, 2024
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 28 2021, plaintiff Jermaine Williams was inside his vehicle when defendant officers Delarosa, Caraballo, Zahid, and Bhatti approached plaintiff in an unmarked car and instructed plaintiff to exit his vehicle.
After plaintiff exited his vehicle, without justification or cause Defendants Delarosa, Caraballo, Zahid, and Bhatti arrested plaintiff by throwing him to the ground, handcuffing him, and punching him about the body. Defendant Delarosa then punched plaintiff in the face while plaintiff was immobile and handcuffed on
the ground. Defendants Delarosa, Caraballo, Zahid, and Bhatt continued to assault plaintiff until plaintiff was rendered unconscious.
Defendants then had plaintiff transported t...
Lewis, Ryan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 502134/2023,
Supreme Court - Kings, January 24, 2023, ended May 3, 2024
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 8, 2021, plaintiff was standing on a sidewalk outside a smoke shop when officers stopped, detained, and placed plaintiff into custody without reasonable suspicion. For four hours, plaintiff was handcuffed to the floor. Plaintiff was questioned by officers regarding a recent shooting incident. Plaintiff was released with an appearance ticket for consumption of alcohol. Plaintiff did not have alcohol on his person at time of arrest. The ticket was dismissed.
On June 9, 2021, plaintiff was confronted by plain clothes officers while in vicinity of the smoke shop. Officers failed to announce themselves as NYPD officer seized Plaintiff, and detained him. Plaintiff was detained for eight hours. For three hours...
Moran et al v. city of New York et al.
Case # 05CV01571,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Fifth Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiffs were protesting on the street in union square where defendant officers arrested them with tight handcuffs. Plaintiffs were then sent to pier 57 where there were toxic chemicals exposed. Plaintiffs were charged with disorderly conduct and all the charges for all plaintiffs were either dismissed or issued adjournment contemplation of dismissal of their cases.