Jovanna Martes

Badge #24350, Hispanic Female

Police Officer at 44th Precinct since November 2014, active

Also served at Patrol Borough Bronx

Service started July 2012, made $113,000 last year, Tax #953055

Other names: Jovanna Woloski

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Chokehold
Force: Physical force (2)
Force: Restricted Breathing
Discourtesy: Action
Discourtesy: Word
Offensive Language: Other (2)

Complaints

5 Complaints

24 Allegations

8 Substantiated

3 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)

1 Substantiated (Charges)

4 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)

1 Complainant Uncooperative

1 Exonerated

2 Unable to Determine

3 Unsubstantiated

9 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202203226, May 2022

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant:	Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Complainant Uncooperative

additional details

Complaint #202200930, January 2022

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant:	Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
Complainant:	Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant:	Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines

additional details

Complaint #202107178, November 2021

Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Other
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Unable to Determine
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Unable to Determine
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status:	Pending
Penalty:	APU - Decision Pending

additional details

Complaint #201901679, November 2018

Allegation:	Offensive Language: Other
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Action
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Penalty:	Instructions

additional details

Complaint #201402567, March 2014

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #202203226, May 2022
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital	Black Male, 25-29	Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202200930, January 2022
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop	Black Male, 40-44	Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word	Black Male, 40-44	Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word		Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card	Black Male, 40-44	Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202107178, November 2021
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force	Male, 25-29	Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Restricted Breathing	Male, 25-29	Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word	Male, 25-29	Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Male, 25-29	Within NYPD Guidelines
Offensive Language: Other	Male, 25-29	Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Chokehold	Male, 25-29	Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force	Male, 25-29	Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Restricted Breathing	Male, 25-29	Unable to Determine
Force: Chokehold	Male, 25-29	Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force	Male, 25-29	Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force	Male, 25-29	Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force	Male, 25-29	Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201901679, November 2018
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other	Hispanic Male, 43	Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Discourtesy: Word	Hispanic Male, 43	Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Discourtesy: Action	Hispanic Male, 43	Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital	Hispanic Male, 43	Exonerated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #201402567, March 2014
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Hispanic Male, 32	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Hispanic Male, 32	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Hispanic Male, 32	Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.