Christopher G. Haws

Badge #1280, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Queens North since July 2017, active
Also served at Patrol Borough Queens North, 110th Precinct
Service started January 2013, made $171,000 last year, Tax #953955

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Lawsuit settlements:
$65,000   Diaz, Angel, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV03950
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
10 Allegations
5 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201901085, December 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201608018, September 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201408666, August 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201901085, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 19 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 19 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 19 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 19 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 19 Exonerated
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201608018, September 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Hispanic Male, 21 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Male, 21 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201408666, August 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 49 Complainant Uncooperative
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Diaz, Angel, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV03950, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, July 9, 2015, ended August 1, 2016
$65,000 Settlement
Complaint, First Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiffs were stopped and arrested by defendant officers. Defendant officers physically assaulted plaintiffs and took them to the 115th precinct and charged them with resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration. All charges were dismissed.