Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Conrad, Garry J. vs City of New York
Case # 154550/2017,
Supreme Court - New York, July 19, 2017, ended February 27, 2020
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On May 18, 2016, Eric Conrad allegedly had a verbal disagreement with an employee at Food Emporium on West 49th Street and Eighth Avenue in Manhattan. An off-duty, plain-clothed unnamed NYPD officer grabbed Mr. Conrad and escorted him out of the Food Emporium where defendant unnamed NYPD officers and sergeants arrived at the scene. An officer tackled Mr. Conrad to the ground, fracturing his jaw and causing contusions and lacerations to Mr. Conrad's face. Mr. Conrad was restrained on the ground and attempted to lift himself up from the ground and release himself from the grip of the officer. Mr. Conrad was then shot nine times. The manner of death was deemed a "homicide (shot by police)." The autopsy indicated t...
Devereaux, Michael J. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 154065/2015,
Supreme Court - New York, April 27, 2015
Complaint
Description: On Monday, June 23, 2014 Plaintiff was walking from work to his home with his dog when he was falsely and aggressively accused by PO Peralta of striking an unknown, unidentified car that supposedly had proceeded through the crosswalk. Despite the fact that PO Peralta was well over 150 yards away, PO Peralta accused Plaintiff of damaging this supposed car. Plaintiff informed PO Peralta he was certainly mistaken. In response PO Peralta stated Plaintiff was disrespecting him and on that basis Plaintiff was going to be arrested. Plaintiff put down his briefcase and tied his dog to a nearby sign, which PO Peralta intentionally mistook for resisting arrest. Plaintiff explained there were others nearby who would take ...