Philip J. Fioranelli

Philip J. Fioranelli

Philip J. Fioranelli
Badge #13928, White Male
Former Police Officer at Brooklyn Court Section
Also served at 75th Precinct, 81st Precinct
Service started July 2004, ended August 2025, Tax #934865

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 86603/10
Closed: 3/26/2012
Case: 2010-2274
Closed: 8/13/2010

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202311677, December 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #200905042, March 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Female, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200818219, December 2008
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200805386, April 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200613222, October 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202311677, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #200905042, March 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Female, 27 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Female Alleged Victim Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200818219, December 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 42 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 42 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 42 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200805386, April 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200613222, October 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Female, 21 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Female, 21 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Female, 21 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 86603/10
Opened: 7/6/2010
Closed: 3/26/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully engaged in a physical and verbal altercation with another Member of Service
  2. Guilty: Having become aware of an allegation of serious misconduct, failed to notify the Internal Affairs Bureau
  3. Guilty: Wrongfully in possession of a counterfeit Department shield
  4. Guilty: Made misleading statements during an official Department interview
Penalty: Forfeiture of forty- five (45) vacation days

Case: 2010-2274
Closed: 8/13/2010
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, impeded a Department investigation.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to make proper notifications.
  3. Pleaded Guilty: While on-duty, officer was involved in an on-duty verbal and physical altercation with another member of the service.
  4. Pleaded Guilty: While on-duty, was wrongfully in possession of a bogus or counterfeit New York City Police Department shield, without permission or authority to do so.
Penalty: Vacation days (45 days)


Lawsuits

Alshimary, Aqil vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 157093/2024, Supreme Court - New York, August 6, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about May 18, 2023 Plaintiff was at the reception area of a garage seeking assistance in locating his car when PO Geronimo Tyrell, PO Phillip Fioranelli, and POs John and Jane 1-10 approached and wrongfully accused him of trespassing. POs then illegally searched Plaintiff, identifying no contraband. Though the timing is unclear based on the complaint PO FIoranelli pulled out his gun and also jumped on Plaintiff's back. PO Fioranelli also sprayed pepper spray multiple times in Plaintiff's eyes and mouth then used his own hand to spread the sprary around Plaintiff's face. PO Fioranelli also yanked on Plaintiff's hoodie and thereby restricted Plaintiff's ability to breathe. Plaintiff was arrested, handcuffed...

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 12/26/2013
Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional lawsuits 10CV294, 10CV1092