Kerriann M. Smith

Kerriann M. Smith

Kerriann M. Smith
Badge #6522, Black Female
Detective Specialist at School Safety Division Youth Response Team since July 2023, active
Service started July 2011, made $152,000 last year, Tax #951275

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (3)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Stop (3)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-27869
Closed: 7/6/2023
Case: 2017-17648
Closed: 7/20/2017

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
11 Allegations
9 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
7 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300296, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details

Complaint #202206211, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202107061, November 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202300296, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Age 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details
Complaint #202206211, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Hispanic Male, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202107061, November 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name White Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number White Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-27869
Closed: 7/6/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training

Case: 2017-17648
Closed: 7/20/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to safeguard a prisoner resulting in the escape of said individual
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)