Timothy Harrington

Former Captain at Queens Court Section
Service started July 1996, ended January 2026, Tax #917095
White Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded

Complaint #201501468, February 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200802670, January 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200310059, December 2003
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201501468, February 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 17 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200802670, January 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 36 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 36 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Hispanic Male, 36 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Hispanic Male, 36 Exonerated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200310059, December 2003
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Freites, Lady, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 809131/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 30, 2023
Complaint
Description: On, July 1 2018, at approximately 5:00pm inside of 2020 Grand Avenue, The Bronx NY, plaintiffs Lady Freites, Delio Guillen, Denia Guillen, Thomas Guillen, were approached by defendant officers, Orlando Colon, Wilbert Morales, Daniel Collins, Zora Strothers, Charles Awani, Jose Batista, Timothy Harrington, Adam Acosta and Stephanie Cepeda whereby they grabbed, struck and retrained plaintiffs torso, arms and wrists. Defendants illegally stopped, searched, detained and arrested plaintiffs with excessive force. Defendant officers did not posses a lawful reason to approach the plaintiffs as they were not observed to be committing any crimes or violations of the law. Defendant officers also subjected plaintiffs to il...

Baptiste, Marlene, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 528449/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, November 8, 2021
Complaint
Description: On November 20, 2019, inside 1322 Sterling Place, Apt. IL, Plaintiffs Megan and Marlene were inside the apartment while Plaintiff Hoyle was elsewhere. Defendants unlawfully entered said location and illegally searched the apartment by rushing the door, without consent or a warrant. Defendants then detained unlawfully and questioned Plaintiffs Marlene and Megan as to the whereabouts of Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle. Defendants then physically restrained both Plaintiffs with metal handcuffs forcefully in an excessively tight fashion. Defendants did not have probable cause or reasonable suspicion to detain either Plaintiff. Defendants, then subjected Plaintiff Megan to illegal interrogation tactics unless she did not comp...

Other Documents