Brian J. Klarman

Brian J. Klarman

Brian J. Klarman
Lieutenant at 48th Precinct since January 2023
Also served at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Impact Response Team, 24th Precinct, 25th Precinct
Service started January 2008, made $170,000 last year, Tax #946506
Hispanic Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29078
Closed: 12/1/2023

View Details

Complaints

11 Complaints
18 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
3 Exonerated
6 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202402272, March 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202206670, October 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202203510, May 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 7, 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202203029, May 2022
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201801682, February 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 56
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201608930, October 2016
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201311893, April 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201303460, April 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201209635, July 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201106901, May 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200817766, December 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202402272, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Female, 60-64 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202206670, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202203510, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Age 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Other Age 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Female, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 7, 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details
Complaint #202203029, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201801682, February 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 56 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201608930, October 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 36 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201311893, April 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201303460, April 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 27 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201209635, July 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 46 Exonerated
Force: Hit against inanimate object Male, 46 Unsubstantiated
Force: Chokehold Male, 46 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201106901, May 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 17 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200817766, December 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29078
Closed: 12/1/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Ashaqua, Janaqual vs P.O. Odonell, Patrick, et al.
Case # 160256/2019, Supreme Court - New York, January 14, 2020
Complaint
Description: On October 24, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. plaintiff, Janaqual Ashaqua, while lawfully inside of 2015 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, was falsely arrested, falsely imprisoned, unlawfully seized and subjected to excessive force by the defendants when they slammed plaintiff to the ground, tased him twice in the abdomen, causing plaintiff to suffer serious physical injuries in the head and stomach. Defendant then unlawfully handcuffed and arrested plaintiff without probable cause or legal justification. Then plaintiff was transported him to Harlem Hospital against his will without any legal justification or probable cause. Defendant police officers knowingly and wrongfully accused plaintiff of being emotionally disturb...

Pridgen, Cynthia, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 155790/2012, Supreme Court - New York, December 14, 2012, ended September 25, 2018
Zero Disposition