Brian J. Klarman

Brian J. Klarman

Brian J. Klarman
Lieutenant at 48th Precinct since January 2023, active
Also served at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Impact Response Team, 24th Precinct, 25th Precinct
Service started January 2008, made $142,000 last year, Tax #946506
Hispanic Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29078
Closed: 12/1/2023

View Details

Complaints

10 Complaints
17 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
3 Exonerated
6 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202206670, October 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202203510, May 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #202203029, May 2022
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201801682, February 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 56
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201608930, October 2016
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201311893, April 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201303460, April 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201209635, July 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201106901, May 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200817766, December 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202206670, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202203510, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Age 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Other Age 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Female, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #202203029, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201801682, February 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 56 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201608930, October 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 36 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201311893, April 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201303460, April 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 27 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201209635, July 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 46 Exonerated
Force: Hit against inanimate object Male, 46 Unsubstantiated
Force: Chokehold Male, 46 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201106901, May 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 17 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200817766, December 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29078
Closed: 12/1/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Ashaqua, Janaqual vs P.O. Odonell, Patrick, et al.
Case # 160256/2019, Supreme Court - New York, January 14, 2020