Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Antonio O. Ortiz
Badge #6625,
Hispanic Male
Service
started July 2015,
made $129,000 last year,
Tax #959016
Complaints
2
Complaints
4
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Complainant Unavailable
1
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
Complaint #202205032,
August 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #201901851,
February 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #202205032, August 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Black Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Black Male, 40-44 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Male, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201901851, February 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched | Black Male, 35 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2020-22195
Closed: 10/5/2020
Case Details:
- Guilty: Involved in verbal altercation. Involved in a physical altercation..
- Guilty: Failed to timely make proper notifications.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), pre-trial suspension days (30 days), vacation days (5 days)
Lawsuits
Grant, Jeffrey vs City of New York, et al.Case # 155221/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 26, 2023