Ryan T. Loomis

Ryan T. Loomis

Ryan T. Loomis
Badge #11460, White Male, 38
Police Officer at Training Bureau since May 2019, active
Also served at Emergency Service Unit Canine Team, Patrol Borough Manhattan North, Strategic Response Group 2 Bronx
Service started July 2010, made $126,000 last year, Tax #949216

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk

Lawsuit settlements:
$30,000   Newsome, Walter L. vs City of New York, et al., 2019 NYCSC NYCSC 151597/2019
$85,000   Gambrell, Gerrick vs City of New York, et al., 2015 NYCSC NYCSC 153596/2015
$25,000   Harris, Eric, et al. vs City of New York, 2014 NYCSC NYCSC 159610/2014
$35,000   Stevens v. The City of New York, SDNY SDNY 12CV06823
View Details

Complaints

4 Allegations
1 Substantiated
2 Complaints
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Unsubstantiated

February 2016 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

March 2012 Complaint
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

February 2016 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 24 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 24 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
March 2012 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 53 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $175,000 total settlements.

Newsome, Walter L. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 151597/2019, Supreme Court - New York, February 27, 2019, ended December 22, 2020
$30,000 Settlement

Gambrell, Gerrick vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 153596/2015, Supreme Court - New York, April 16, 2015, ended April 19, 2016
$85,000 Settlement

Harris, Eric, et al. vs City of New York
Case # 159610/2014, Supreme Court - New York, October 10, 2014, ended June 3, 2019
$25,000 Settlement

Stevens v. The City of New York
Case # 12CV06823, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$35,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers approached Plaintiff's legally parked car, demanded to see ID, forcibly removed Plaintiff from his car, assaulted him, sprayed him with mace, and searched his person and the car. Plaintiff was taken to the 32nd precinct and charged with unspecified crimes, which were later dismissed.

Lewis v. The City of New York et al
Case # 16CV07921, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Dismissed without Prejudice
Amended Complaint, Order of Dismissal, Complaint
Description: Defendant Officer Nash arrested and charged Plaintiff with 190.25 (1), 509(1), and 511(1)(A). The case against Plaintiff terminated with a disorderly conduct violation. Defendant Nash later falsely used the information to obtain a search warrant.

Other Documents