Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2022-25954
Opened: 2/24/2010
Closed: 8/12/2022
Case Details:
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Failed to activate body worn camera
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Failed to make proper notification
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Failed to terminate vehicle pursuit
Penalty: Vacation days (25 days)
Case: 2010-1760
Opened: 6/30/2010
Closed: 4/12/2012
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While off duty appeared at Bronx traffic court with an individual known to the Department and requested the testifying officer to extend a courtesy to said individual
Penalty: See Case #2010-421 for penalty
Case: 2010-1761
Opened: 2/24/2010
Closed: 6/30/2010
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While off duty appeared at Bronx traffic court with an individual known to the Department and requested the testifying officer to extend a courtesy to said individual.
Penalty: Vacation days (45 days)
Case: 2010-421
Opened: 2/24/2010
Closed: 4/28/2010
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Failed to respond to a radio run that was assigned to said member and his partner from dispatch pursuant to a 911 call.
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully made improper memobook entries.
Penalty: Vacation days (45 days)
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $17,500 total settlements.
Williams, Matthew vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 022636/2014E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 7, 2014, ended June 11, 2018
$17,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about March 11, 2013, Plaintiff was lawfully in his residence when Defendant NYPD officers Vele, Wright, Doyle, Burke, Meter, Marion, Persaud, and Delgardo arrived at his home and asked to speak with him and asked that he step outside of his home. The Defendants did so without a warrant. Plaintiff obeyed the Defendants' request and exited the home. The Defendants then searched Plaintiff without any legal justification, which search did not reveal any illegal contraband. Nonetheless, the Defendants handcuffed Plaintiff and transported him against his will to the precinct. Plaintiff was held in the precinct for several hours before being forced to participate in a lineup with other individuals that did not ...
Machiote, Cynthia vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 302116/2014,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 28, 2014, ended March 24, 2016
Zero Disposition
