Conclusion Meanings:
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Harvey, Dwayne vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV00901,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 5, 2016, ended October 26, 2017
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On Aug. 4th, 2015, plaintiff was arrested for drunk driving. After failing a field sobriety test, plaintiff was taken to the precinct. The sobriety test was conducted by officer Kessler. The plaintiff is physically disabled and so was not able to perform a walking test, and could not properly blow due to COPD. Only one test was listed after 2-3 tries by the plaintiff. The officer used a Intoxilyzer for the test.
Harvey v. City of New York et al
Case # 16CV01649,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Complaint,
Complaint (under new docket#)
Description: Plaintiff was arrested for drunk driving after failing a series of field sobriety tests because he is disabled and could not take the walking test or properly blow.