Miles D. Holman

Miles D. Holman

Miles D. Holman
Badge #31489, Black Male, 40
Police Officer at Crime Prevention Division since October 2023, active
Also served at Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, 1st Precinct
Service started July 2012, made $124,000 last year, Tax #952856
miles.holman@nypd.org

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201910657, December 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Female, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Female, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201806565, August 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201308239, August 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Black Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 2014
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201306258, July 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201910657, December 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Female, 32 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Female, 32 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 32 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201806565, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Physical force Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201308239, August 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 22 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Female, 22 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Black Female, 22 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 2014
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201306258, July 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 26 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 26 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Wright, Omar vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 156038/2019, Supreme Court - New York, July 2, 2019

Jones Sr., Rafael Arden vs P.O. Holman, John Doe Et. Al
Case # 16CV00556, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 11, 2016
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was at the under-served veterans office when Defendant officers arrived and asked him to get against the wall. Plaintiff began recording and was told he wasn't under arrest. EMS workers then arrived and Plaintiff was handcuffed and brought to the hospital. Plaintiff was asked to sign a consent to treatment form and when he refused he was strapped to a stretcher, injected with a syringe and work up 2 days later. Plaintiff got in touch with his attorney and a judge ruled that he should be released from custody.