Edgar E. Santos

Edgar E. Santos

Edgar E. Santos
Badge #22843, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 43rd Precinct since October 2025
Also served at Warrant Section
Service started November 2020, made $80,800 last year, Tax #970186

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Lawsuit Settlements:
$10,000   Balde, Mamadou vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 BCSC BCSC 819840/2023E
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
15 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 SRAD Closure
2 Unable to Determine
6 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202510523, October 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202503609, April 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202408949, September 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202404912, May 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.50 days)
additional details

Complaint #202305267, June 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202510523, October 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Age 30-34 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202503609, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202408949, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202404912, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.50 days)
additional details
Complaint #202305267, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Dominican Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Dominican Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Balde, Mamadou vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 819840/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 13, 2023, ended July 22, 2025
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: That on August 29th, at approximately, 9:00 p.m., in the vicinity of 1222 Boynton Avenue, Bronx, NY, defendant PO Santos and others stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained Plaintiff without legal justification or excuse. The defendants had no probable cause or reasonable suspicion that the plaintiff was engaged in an illegal activity. The search yielded no evidence of any guns, drugs or contraband. Despite the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing by the plaintiff, the defendants formally arrested the plaintiff and transported him to the precinct. While Plaintiff was in the custody of the defendants at the precinct, defendants prepared and filed false paperwork against plaintiff. As a resu...