Pablo Segarra

Badge #4122, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Manhattan Court Section
Also served at 34th Precinct
Service started January 2005, ended February 2016, Tax #937796

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Discourtesy: Word


Complaints

3 Complaints
4 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201102321, February 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200803554, March 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Penalty: Vacation: 20 days
additional details

Complaint #200603395, March 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201102321, February 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 34 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200803554, March 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 38 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Male, 38 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Penalty: Vacation: 20 days
additional details
Complaint #200603395, March 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 29 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2009-798
Document
Opened: 9/7/2009
Closed: 8/1/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to provide name and shield number to an individual known to the Department
  2. Guilty: Failed to make activity log entry
Penalty: Forfeiture of twenty (20) vacation days

Case: 2010-2570
Document
Opened: 11/19/2010
Closed: 8/1/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to give a proper radio disposition to the radio dispatcher at the end of assignment
  2. Guilty: Failed to have his Department identification at roll call
  3. Guilty: Failed to return from meal period at required time
  4. Guilty: Failed to notify desk officer of a police incident involving a child under sixteen years of age
  5. Guilty: Failed to complete a juvenile report for said child
  6. Guilty: Failed to make accurate activity log entries.
Penalty: See case# 2009-798 for penalty