Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $210,000 total settlements.
Rawlins, Nathaniel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 160292/2015,
Supreme Court - New York, October 16, 2015, ended May 24, 2016
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 1, 2015, Plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity 0f 231 East 111th Street, New York County where he was stopped, searched, grabbed, punched, assaulted, battered and arrested by defendant police officers, Officer Christop Serco and unnamed John Doe/Roe. Plaintiff was beaten about his head, neck, back and limbs. Plaintiff alleges that he was illegally stopped and frisked based solely on his age and race.
Liebert, Leonard vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 150591/2011,
Supreme Court - New York, December 19, 2011, ended June 8, 2020
$190,000 Settlement
Summons/Complaint