Jose A. Santini

Jose A. Santini

Jose A. Santini
Badge #11211, Hispanic Male, 39
Police Officer at Police Service Area 5 since July 2025
Also served at Manhattan Court Section
Service started January 2014, made $159,000 last year, Tax #956237

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2019-20383
Closed: 4/11/2019

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$370   Geico Indemnity Company Aso Garrett, Pamela vs City of New York, et al., 2021 CCQ CCQ 025292/2021
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
8 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
3 Unfounded
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202407495, July 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sexual Miscon (Inappropriate Touching)
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Humiliation: fail to cover)
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202106131, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201802906, April 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
Complaint Report
additional details

Complaint #202407495, July 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Sexual Miscon (Inappropriate Touching) Black Female, 35-39 Unfounded
Force: Handcuffs too tight Black Female, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Humiliation: fail to cover) Black Female, 35-39 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202106131, October 2021
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201802906, April 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 36 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
Complaint Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2019-20383
Closed: 4/11/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business.
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully disseminated confidential Department information.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Geico Indemnity Company Aso Garrett, Pamela vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 025292/2021, Civil Court - Queens, October 12, 2021, ended May 4, 2023
$370 Settlement

Other Documents