Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Bekka, Steven T. vs Detective Nash, Stanley, et al.
Case # 19CV06041,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 28, 2019, ended May 7, 2020
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On May 20, 2014, Steven Bekka was arrested for a crime he did not commit. On July 8, 2016, he was found not guilty at trial. During the trial, Bekka learned that Officer Nash and Officer Doe charged him with a felony instead of a misdemeanor. During the two years he was incarcerated, Bekka lost his job, his relationship with his daughter, and was subject to gang violence.
Clark, Christopher C. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV07744,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 10, 2017, ended January 29, 2020
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was stopped, frisked, arrested, and charged with weapon and drug possession. Those charges were dismissed but Plaintiff was re-charged after being detained with robbery and a hate crime.
Schopmeyer v. City Of New York , et al
Case # 16CV00462,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Complaint
Description: At the request of Det. Dash, Plaintiff met him at the 6th Precinct in regards to a complaint for an unpaid bill by another individual that had been resolved. Despite Det. Dash being made aware that it was resolved, Plaintiff was arrested and charged with grand larceny. The DA declined to prosecute the Plaintiff and issued a cut slip and plaintiff was released the next day.