Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $45,000 total settlements.
Woolard, Tarnisha as Adm of Emile, Christin, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 527157/2025,
Supreme Court - Kings, August 14, 2025
Marcus, Romel et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV03313,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 24, 2025
Complaint
Arcos-Rodriguez, Alberto, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 521507/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, August 2, 2022, ended May 3, 2024
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 13, 2021, Plaintiffs were outside of a venue they had rented when they were approached by officers. While one of the Plaintiffs tried to explain that no one had called the police, the officers used excessive force and began to unlawfully arrest the Plaintiffs without cause. One Plaintiff was hit in the head by three separate officers to the point of losing consciousness and tased in the arm four times. He awoke at the precinct and was denied medical treatment. Another Plaintiff was thrown to the ground and an officer placed his knee on the Plaintiff's neck, was punched in the head, and was pepper sprayed. A third Plaintiff was thrown to the ground, kicked, and punched. His request for medical attention ...