Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 6 known lawsuits, $522,500 total settlements.
Dunn, Tyson vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 704573/2020,
Supreme Court - Queens, June 15, 2020
Complaint
Description: At or about 10:00 A.M. on June 1, 2017 and continuing thereafter at various locations and times, including but not limited to the 114th Police Precinct, in the County of the Queens, Sergeant Mark Ward of the NYPD and other unnamed oficers unlawfully and falsely detained, arrested and imprisoned the plaintiff without any reasonable cause or lawful or proper reason. The officers wrongfully and falsely arrested and imprisoned the plaintiff without any just right and without grounds therefore and charged the plaintiff with violating Burglary in the Second Degree, Petit Larceny and Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Fifth Degree for an incident that allegedly took place on April 17, 2017. The officers exe...
Mcintosh, Rohan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 710499/2017,
Supreme Court - Queens, October 13, 2017, ended September 18, 2019
$7,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 21, 2016, Plaintiff was driving back home. A Black Chevy Impala was driving ahead of him. As Plaintiff parked his vehicle in front of his home, the black Impala made a u-turn, turned around and came to stop immediately behind his parked vehicle. Three men who appeared to be plain clothed police officers exited the Impala and approached Plaintiff as Plaintiff opened his car door and was preparing to exit his own vehicle. The three men asked him for his license and registration, which Plaintiff immediately provided. Defendants then asked Plaintiff if he had any weapons on him. Plaintiff replied in the negative, after which the Defendants searched the Plaintiff by patting him down and checking his pockets....
Rodriguez, Javiel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 030540/2014,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 15, 2014, ended April 2, 2015
$30,000 Settlement
Jacklin, Charrisse, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 309123/2012,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 21, 2013, ended January 30, 2014
$120,000 Settlement
Parrish, Trevel, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 309729/2012,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 19, 2012, ended August 30, 2017
$90,000 Settlement
Nelson, Michael, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 310036/2011,
Supreme Court - Bronx, November 21, 2011, ended June 4, 2013
$275,000 Settlement