Zhenxian Zhou

Zhenxian Zhou

Zhenxian Zhou
Captain at Strategic Response Group 2 Bronx since February 2025
Service started January 2007, made $186,000 last year, Tax #943987
Asian Male

Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202200330, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201507350, August 2015
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202200330, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property White Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201507350, August 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 19 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 19 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Farrell, Matthew vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 509783/2015, Supreme Court - Kings, December 4, 2015
Complaint
Description: On September 4, 2013, Plaintiff received notification that Detectives from the 76th Precinct in Brooklyn wanted to speak with him. Plaintiff decided to oblige because he was curious. On September 5, 2013, Plaintiff called Detective Jurewictz, who asked Plaintiff to come into the 76th Precinct but refused to tell Plaintiff what he wanted to talk about. Unbeknownst to Plaintiff, Detective Jurewictz was in the process of framing Plaintiff for a robbery he did not commit in order to impress his superiors at the NYPD. On September 5, 2013, at approximately 9:30 a.m., Plaintiff arrived at the 76th Precinct. Detective Jurewictz questioned Plaintiff about the robbery he did not commit. Without probable cause or any leg...