Justin J. Pedersen

Badge #6325, White Male
Police Officer at Bronx Court Section since July 2021, active
Also served at 33rd Precinct, 26th Precinct Detective Squad
Service started January 2012, made $131,000 last year, Tax #952097

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2016-15475
Closed: 8/17/2016

View Details

Complaints

5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Complaints
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

October 2020 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

February 2016 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

January 2016 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 0-9
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

October 2020 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
additional details
February 2016 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 30 Exonerated
additional details
January 2016 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 0-9 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2016-15475
Closed: 8/17/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, did wrongfully damage property belonging to another individual.
  2. Guilty: While off-duty, prevented a person known to the Department from communicating a request for police assistance.
  3. Guilty: While off-duty, was involved in an off-duty incident/unusual police occurrence and failed to promptly notify the operations unit.
Penalty: Counseling, pre-trial suspension days (30 days)