Gregory A. Danca

Badge #20062, White Male
Former Police Officer at 107th Precinct
Service started July 2013, ended August 2024, Tax #954697

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 8/5/2024
Case: 3 Allegations

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$37,500   Gomez, Rafael, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2016 SDNY SDNY 16CV02377
View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
4 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)

Complaint #202200362, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, June 25, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202200362, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, June 25, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 8/5/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, training, vacation days (3 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Gomez, Rafael, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV02377, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 5, 2016, ended February 3, 2017
$37,500 Settlement
Amended Complaint, Complaint
Description: Plaintiffs car window had been broken and after they approached multiple officers to make a report, Defendant Officers unlawfully searched them, illegally assaulted them, and arrested them. Plaintiffs were brought to the 34th Precinct and charged with resisting arrest, disorderly conduct, and harassment, which were later dismissed.