Matthew J. Sgambati

Matthew J. Sgambati

Matthew J. Sgambati
Badge #4473, White Male
Detective Grade 1 at Firearms Suppression Section since January 2025
Also served at Detective Bureau Gun Violence Suppression Division, 23rd Precinct, Gang Squad Manhattan, Gang Squad Manhattan North, Narcotics Borough Manhattan North
Service started July 2007, made $217,000 last year, Tax #944997

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26518
Closed: 7/11/2022
Case: 2022-26519
Closed: 7/11/2022

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$25,000   Cuevas, Rebecca By Mng Vazquez, Chantel vs City of New York, et al., 2017 NYCSC NYCSC 157516/2017
$20,000   Barber, Esteban vs City of New York, et al., 2015 NYCSC NYCSC 161727/2015
$20,000   Monzon, Joseph vs City of New York, et al., 2015 NYCSC NYCSC 151351/2015
View Details

Complaints

10 Complaints
19 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
5 Unsubstantiated
6 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202402893, March 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202405754, March 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202005986, August 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201809854, September 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201804310, May 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201705384, June 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201504022, May 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 14
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201104436, April 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201007063, May 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200903146, March 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202402893, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202405754, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Age 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Female, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202005986, August 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 15-17 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 15-17 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201809854, September 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 23 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 23 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201804310, May 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 28 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201705384, June 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 40 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201504022, May 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 14 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Hispanic Male, 45 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201104436, April 2011
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201007063, May 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200903146, March 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 29 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26518
Closed: 7/11/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-26519
Closed: 7/11/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  2. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $65,000 total settlements.

Ross, Anthony vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159242/2018, Supreme Court - New York, October 10, 2018
Complaint
Description: On May 17, 2018 at approximately 8 pm, Plaintiff emerged from his neighborhood bodega and was standing among people when 2 unmarked police cars pulled up. Plaintiff and his friend walked away and the driver of the police vehicle pulled the car in front of them. Defendant, NYPD officer Palmer stopped Plaintiff asked where he was going and told Plaintiff he would search him. Plaintiff refused and asked why he was being searched. Defendant Palmer refused to answer him and started aggressively searching Plaintiff, specifically his neck, shoulders, arms, chest and waistband and aggressively grabbed Plaintiff's genital demanding that Plaintiff produce a gun. Plaintiff said he did not have a gun. Defendant handcuffed ...

Cuevas, Rebecca By Mng Vazquez, Chantel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 157516/2017, Supreme Court - New York, September 6, 2017, ended March 18, 2019
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On January 1, 2016, Defendant NYPD officers LT. ALISON ESPOSITO, and DET. MATTHEW SGAMBATI (Shield 4473) unlawfully entered the residence located at 345 East 101st Street, Apt. 4F in New York, NY without warrant and then assaulted, frisked, handcuffed, and arrested infant Plaintiff Rebecca Cuevas. The complaint does not state the circumstances that precipitated this encounter, but states that a malicious prosecution of the infant Plaintiff for various unspecified illegal acts ensued before the case was ultimately dismissed on May 25, 2016.

Barber, Esteban vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 161727/2015, Supreme Court - New York, November 3, 2015, ended September 28, 2017
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 19, 2015, Plaintiff, a known member of the CopWatch Patrol Unit, videotaped police officers arresting an individual. One of Defendants Detectives Erin Barnes and Matthew Sgambatti struck Plaintiff in the chest while he was filming, causing his phone to fall to the ground, and Plaintiff to go to the hospital for treatment. Other officers present did nothing to intervene. Plaintiff suffered humiliation and great physical and mental pain.

Monzon, Joseph vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 151351/2015, Supreme Court - New York, March 11, 2015, ended July 21, 2015
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 14, 2014 Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle being driven by his friend when they were pulled over by POs Matthew Sgambati, Brian Greco, and/or John Does 1-4. After receiving Plaintiff's identification POs asked Plaintiff questions regarding his brother. Plaintiff was not able to provide information regarding his brother because he had not seen him in over a year. Plaintiff and his friend were ordered to exit the vehicle, which POs then searched without discovering anything. Plaintiff was then arrested, taken to the precinct, and again question regarding his brother. Plaintiff was falsely charged with possession of one rock of Molly, which Plaintiff denies possession of. Plaintiff spent three days ...